From Amnesty International
Japan: Appeals for compensation fall on deaf ears
press release, 10/28/2005
http://www.amnesty.org/resources/slideshow/comfortwomen
http://web.amnesty.org/library/index/ENGASA220122005
Amnesty International today called on the Japanese government to
accept full responsibility for crimes committed against women
condemned to sexual slavery by their Japanese captors -- so-called
"comfort women" -- before and during the Second World War.
In a comprehensive report entitled "Still Waiting After 60 years:
Justice for Survivors of Japan's Military Sexual Slavery System",
the organization outlines the brutal treatment suffered by "comfort
women" and the excuses given over the years to deny responsibility
for their suffering. Up to 200,000 women were sexually enslaved by
the Japanese military before and during the Second World War, many
of whom were under the age of 20, with some as young as 12. The
report also provides recommendations to the Japanese government and
the international community on ensuring justice for the remaining
survivors.
"The Japanese government must finally right the wrongs of over 60
years by providing full reparations to the survivors of this
horrific system of sexual slavery," said Purna Sen, Director of
Amnesty International's Asia-Pacific Programme.
Survivors of the "comfort women" system are now elderly and unknown
numbers have died without justice, an adequate public apology or
direct compensation from the Japanese government. For years, the
Japanese government consistently denied responsibility for its
system of military sexual slavery and only when evidence directly
linking the Japanese government's role came to light did the
government finally admit responsibility.
"Apologies offered to former "comfort women" have been inadequate,
vague and unacceptable to survivors. Moreover, the Asian Women's
Fund fails to meet international standards of reparation and is
perceived by survivors as a way of buying their silence," said
Purna Sen.
"This is a current human rights issue that should not be relegated
to the past -- it is about lives that have been destroyed and the
continued denial of justice and reparation," said Purna Sen.
"Reparations in this case are not just a moral obligation. Any
state that commits war crimes and crimes against humanity such as
rape and sexual slavery also has a legal obligation to provide full
reparations and a promise of non-repetition directly to the
survivors."
The Japanese government has argued that rape was not a war crime
until 1949, when it was incorporated into the Fourth Geneva
Convention. Amnesty International argues in its report, however,
that there is a wealth of evidence that rape in the context of
armed conflict was a crime under customary international law during
the entire period in which the Japanese government operated its
system of sexual slavery.
"I was taken to China when I was 16 years old," says South Korean
national Lee Ok-sun, now aged 79. She was abducted and taken to
Yanbian, north-eastern China -- where she was forced into sexual
slavery in a "comfort station".
"The age range of the girls was from 14 to 17 and they forced us to
serve 40 to 50 soldiers a day," she says. "It was impossible to
serve that many men, so I refused and was beaten. If a woman
refused they cut her body with a knife; some girls were stabbed.
Some girls got diseases and died... It was a painful experience --
there was not enough food, not enough sleep and I couldn't even
kill myself. I desperately wanted to escape." Lee Ok-sun was in
China for 58 years before she was able to return to South
Korea.
"We want our experience to be written in history so that the next
generation and people in other countries will know what happened to
us and for us to be given justice," said Lola Pilar of the
Philippines, in the Amnesty International report. "The Japanese
government has to admit to what the Japanese soldiers did. We need
an apology and compensation from the Japanese government""
"I want justice more than the money," echoes survivor Lola Amonita,
also of the Philippines. "I want a public apology from the Japanese
government."
Background
"Comfort women" is a term used to euphemistically refer to young
females from the Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam, Malaysia, China,
South and North Korea, Japan, Indonesia, the Netherlands and other
Japanese-occupied countries or regions who were forced in to sexual
slavery by Japanese troops before and during the Second World
War.
The abuse took place at "comfort stations" established by the
Japanese authorities wherever they were based during the course of
the wars. Women were brought to the stations often through
abduction or deception; sometimes they were bought from their
destitute parents.
Despite the widespread prevalence of what was essentially
institutionalized rape, the issue of "comfort women" was ignored by
the International Military Tribunal for the Far East, set up after
the Second World War to prosecute Japan's war criminals. Only
during the Dutch military tribunal in Indonesia were prosecutions
made -- for the sexual enslavement of Dutch women only; similar
crimes against Indonesian women went unpunished.
Humiliated and ashamed, "comfort women" survivors remained silent
for decades before finally speaking out in the early 1990s in
response to persistent denials by Japanese government of its
involvement in the system. Survivors are severely traumatized, many
never married and many were unable to have children as a result of
injuries sustained through repeated rape or due to contracting
sexually transmitted diseases.
The Japanese government denied responsibility for the "comfort
women" system until evidence directly linking the Japanese
government's role was discovered by Professor Yoshimi Yoshiaki in
1992; the Japanese government subsequently issued several official
apologies but these have not been acceptable to the survivors.
Moreover, the Japanese government, in response to tireless
campaigning by survivors of the sexual slavery system and their
supporters and to international criticism, introduced the Asian
Women's Fund in 1995. However the fund is perceived by survivors as
a way for the Japanese government to evade its international legal
responsibilities towards them.